LET Review 2023: Behavioral Learning Theories to Remember for the LET

How do we learn?

To this day, psychologists, educators and sociologists have different answers to this question.

The answer? It depends on who you ask.

In this article, we discuss the different behavioral theories we use in creating learning experiences for our future students. We hope this article helps you in studying for the LET.

Ivan Pavlov’s Classical Conditioning

The learning theory of Classical Conditioning is mostly credited to Ivan Pavlov. In this type of conditioning, reflexes and similar behaviors become responses to antecedent stimuli. Pavlov illustrated this theory in his experiment using dogs.

The Dog Experiment
dogs pavlov

In his experiment, Pavlov conditioned the dogs by controlling the variables that came with food. The food for the dogs was always delivered by the same person wearing white laboratory gowns. He also included a bell during meal times.

By always including this variable with the delivery of the food, the dogs came to associate the arrival of the food with them. Pavlov observed that the dogs would salivate whenever the white lab coat or the bell would be introduced even when there is no food that came with them.
Followers of this type of conditioning believe that the same process happens with humans.

Edward Thorndike’s Connectionism

Edward Thorndike is one of the pioneers of the operant conditioning theory. While the classical conditioning theory based learning on association of one stimuli to another, the operant conditioning theory on the other hand relies on the organism’s behaviors and the different consequences to those behaviors.

The relationship of learning with behaviors and outcomes was first observed by Edward Thorndike and his experiments of cats trying to get out of puzzle boxes.

The Cat Experiment

Edward Thorndike placed cats inside puzzle boxes. Outside the box, Thorndike placed food to encourage the cat to escape from the puzzle boxes. The food is necessary to motivate (Law of Readiness) the cat to escape.

The cat would try different methods to try to escape. Only when the cat pulled a lever will it be able to get out of the box and get the food. This action will result to a favorable consequence (escaping and getting the food).

As the experiment is repeated (Law of Exercise), it would take the cat shorter periods to pull the lever and escape. The cat would try fewer alternatives and it would go straight for the lever to escape.

Thorndike concluded that learners repeat behaviors that have satisfactory results (rewards). On the other hand, behavior that does not lead to satisfying results are not likely to be repeated. Thorndike would call this the Law of Effect.

BF Skinner and his Operant Conditioning Theory

Though Thorndike pioneered the study of the changes in behaviors based on the outcomes of learning activities, BF Skinner is usually credited for the Operant Conditioning Theory as we come to know it today.

In Skinner’s experiments, he built on what Thorndike started. Instead on relying the satisfaction of the organism as the motivating factor for learning, Skinner stressed on the need for reinforcement.

Operant Conditioning Chamber (The Rat and Pigeon Experiment)

Skinner illustrated his theories with the Skinner Box or more formally known as Operant Conditioning Chamber. In the operant conditioning chamber, Skinner placed his subjects (rats and pigeons) with levers or disks that the animals can manipulate. When the pigeon presses the disk or when the rat pulls on the lever, their behavior is reinforced by rewarding them with food.

With this experiment, BF Skinner concluded that reinforcement (food) can be used to control the behavior (pulling of the lever or pressing of the disk) of the organism.

In education, Skinner stressed that reinforcement can be classified as follows:

Albert Bandura’ Social Learning Theory

The social learning suggests that individuals acquire behavior by observing and imitating the behaviors of others. Unlike the learning theories discussed above, the social learning theory adds a social context to learning.
This theory is deeply studied by Albert Bandura and his colleagues. To arrive at this theory, Bandura used the Bobo Doll Experiment.

The Bobo Doll Experiment
In this experiment, Bandura, his colleagues and students observed the behavior of children after watching adults (models) act aggressively towards a Bobo Doll.

Watch Albert Bandura talk about the experiment in this video:

The study shows children imitating the aggressive behaviors such as kicking, punching and throwing the doll into the air. The acquisition of these behaviors happened even when no reinforcement given to the model after the behavior happened. Children who did not see the model (control group) did not show the same aggressive behavior.

Exit mobile version